|
JOHN NAPIER
( 1550 - 1617 )
PHILOSOPHER and MATHEMATICIAN
INVENTOR of LOGARITHMS , INVENTOR
of the
DECIMAL POINT
LOGARITHMS
An Explanation
Defined as:- The logarithm of a number to a given base (
usually 10 or e ) is the index of the power to which the base must be
raised to produce the number.
The whole number proceeding decimal point of the logarithm is known as
the Characteristic,
the decimal fraction being
called the mantissa.
The characteristic
of any number is found by subtracting 1 from the
number of digits of the whole number,
ie; the numbers proceeding the
decimal point.
By using a set of Logarithmic
Tables,
the average school pupil could easily calculate complex numerical
problems quite quickly,
once they had mastered their Logarithms !!
Consider the following problem, 7777 multiplied by 218.
So, for a number of 777.70, the characteristic
would be 2,
and 3 for
our number of 7777.
The mantissa
is found by referring to the portion of logarithm tables shown below.
So, locate the row for 77 and
then locate column 7, this gives 0.8904.
But what about the value of the
remaining digit 7,
well that can be
found looking along the same
row to where there is a
group of columns headed ADD numbered 1 to 9.
|
Logarithms |
Base.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
D |
D |
|
|
|
| log |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 70 |
0.8451 |
0.8457 |
0.8463 |
0.8470 |
0.8476 |
0.8482 |
0.8488 |
0.8494 |
0.8500 |
0.8506 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 71 |
0.8513 |
0.8519 |
0.8525 |
0.8531 |
0.8537 |
0.8543 |
0.8549 |
0.8555 |
0.8561 |
0.8567 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 72 |
0.8573 |
0.8579 |
0.8585 |
0.8591 |
0.8597 |
0.8603 |
0.8609 |
0.8615 |
0.8621 |
0.8627 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 73 |
0.8633 |
0.8639 |
0.8645 |
0.8651 |
0.8657 |
0.8663 |
0.8669 |
0.8675 |
0.8681 |
0.8686 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 74 |
0.8692 |
0.8698 |
0.8704 |
0.8710 |
0.8716 |
0.8722 |
0.8727 |
0.8733 |
0.8739 |
0.8745 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 75 |
0.8751 |
0.8756 |
0.8762 |
0.8768 |
0.8774 |
0.8779 |
0.8785 |
0.8791 |
0.8797 |
0.8802 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 76 |
0.8808 |
0.8814 |
0.8820 |
0.8825 |
0.8831 |
0.8837 |
0.8842 |
0.8848 |
0.8854 |
0.8859 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 77 |
0.8865 |
0.8871 |
0.8876 |
0.8882 |
0.8887 |
0.8893 |
0.8899 |
0.8904 |
0.8910 |
0.8815 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 78 |
0.8921 |
0.8927 |
0.8932 |
0.8938 |
0.8943 |
0.8949 |
0.8954 |
0.8960 |
0.8965 |
0.8971 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| 79 |
0.8976 |
0.8982 |
0.8987 |
0.8993 |
0.8998 |
0.9004 |
0.9009 |
0.9015 |
0.9020 |
0.9025 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
Locate the column for
seven and read off the value 4.
Add this to the previous 0.8904
to give a mantissa
of 0.8908
Therefore, the number 7777 would produce a logarithm whose characteristic
would be 3,
and the mantissa
would be 0.8908,
giving a complete logarithm of
3.8908
Similarly, our other number 218 produces a logarithm of 2.3385.
To multiply our two numbers, all we have to do is add the logarithmic
equivalents of our numbers together.
| so 7777 = |
log 3.8908 |
| and 218 = |
log 2.3385 |
| total = |
log 6.2293 |
which is fine, but how does that relate to an actual number, you may
well ask !
Well, you have to look up what are called anti-logarithmic tables,
which enable you to convert your logarithmic result back to a common
number.
So using the antilogs table, below, we see that the logarithm mantissa 0.2293
gives a value of 1695.
| Antilogarithms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 0.20 |
1585 |
1589 |
1592 |
1596 |
1600 |
1603 |
1607 |
1611 |
1614 |
1618 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.21 |
1622 |
1626 |
1629 |
1633 |
1637 |
1641 |
1644 |
1648 |
1652 |
1656 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.22 |
1660 |
1663 |
1667 |
1671 |
1675 |
1679 |
1683 |
1687 |
1690 |
1694 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.23 |
1698 |
1702 |
1706 |
1710 |
1714 |
1718 |
1722 |
1726 |
1730 |
1734 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.24 |
1738 |
1742 |
1746 |
1750 |
1754 |
1758 |
1762 |
1766 |
1770 |
1774 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.25 |
1778 |
1782 |
1786 |
1791 |
1795 |
1799 |
1803 |
1807 |
1877 |
1816 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.26 |
1820 |
1824 |
1828 |
1832 |
1837 |
1841 |
1845 |
1849 |
1854 |
1858 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.27 |
1862 |
1866 |
1871 |
1875 |
1879 |
1884 |
1888 |
1892 |
1897 |
1901 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 0.28 |
1905 |
1910 |
1914 |
1919 |
1923 |
1928 |
1932 |
1936 |
1941 |
1945 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
| 0.29 |
1950 |
1954 |
1959 |
1963 |
1968 |
1972 |
1977 |
1982 |
1986 |
1991 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
The characteristic
value of our log number is 6,
which means that there
will be 7 digits ( ie: 6 + 1 ) before the decimal point in our result.
So the antilogs table gave us a value of 1695,
so we can write that down
as a final answer of
1,695,000
Please note that this example used 4 digit Logarithm tables to the base
10.
7 digit tables would give a
more accurate result.
For division,
the logarithm equivalents are
subtracted from each other.
For numbers of value less than
1, please refer to further instructions.
( to follow soon )
Napier's original tables were
to the base e,
commonly
referred to as
natural logarithms.
Back to John Napier
|